A Summary of Two Community Studies in Alaska

10/18/99

Click here to start

Table of Contents

A Summary of Two Community Studies in Alaska

Overview of Two Studies

Favorable/Unfavorable Forest Uses

Forest Policy Preferences...

Forest Values Typology

Forest value ranking...

Spatial Location of 3 Communities Forest Values

Overlay of Economic and Recreation Forest Values

Location of Recreation Forest Values on Kenai Peninsula

Location of Aesthetic Forest Values on Kenai Peninsula

Location of History and Cultural Values on Kenai P.

What is Quality of Life?

QOL Survey Methodology 

Components of QOL Survey (April 1999)

QOL Elements--Cordova

The Concept of Community Resiliency

Comparison of QOL and Community Resiliency in 17 Alaskan Communities

Comparison of Preferences for Forest Uses in 1998/99 Studies (Part 1)

Comparison of Preferences for Forest Uses in 1998/99 Studies (Part 2)

Incorporating Forest Values in Forest Planning Process

Overall Satisfaction with QOL

How Much Land Should be Designated as Wilderness?

QOL in Cordova--Comparison of Open and Closed-ended Responses

Most/Least Satisfactory Quality of Life Elements—Cordova

Factor Analysis--Dimensions of Quality of Life

Comparison of Alaska QOL with other Rural Communities in the West

A Comparing of Perceptions about Communities in Alaska 

Resiliency Quote

Percent of respondents that would like to see increases in economic activity in community (by SIC)

Desired Economic Activity—4 Selected Communities

The Politics of Planning 

Why is Planning So Political?

Attributes of Success in Collaborative Planning

Author: Greg Brown, Associate Professor

Email: gregb@alaskapacific.edu

Home Page: http://polar.alaskapacific.edu/gregb